News

Data Protection - Google granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court

Earlier this year we reported on the Court of Appeal decision in the Google case that means claimants can now bring a claim for breach of the Data Protection Act (DPA) if they have suffered distress without also having suffered a pecuniary loss.

Google has successfully applied to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal section 13(2) being disapplied. If successful, the former position will be reinstated.

The requirement to also suffer pecuniary loss was set out in section 13(2) of the DPA. The DPA was introduced in order to give effect to Article 23 of the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC). Article 23 does not contain any such requirement in relation to pecuniary loss and the Court of Appeal held that section 13(2) should be disapplied.

Google applied to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal on three grounds. The first ground is irrelevant to this article and was, in any event, refused. Additionally, Google sought and was granted permission to appeal as to whether the Court of Appeal was right to:

  • hold that section 13(2) of the DPA is incompatible with Article 23 of the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC)..
  • disapply section 13(2) of the DPA on the grounds that it conflicts with the rights in Article 7 (respect for private and family life) and 8 (protection of personal data) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
If Google wins in the Supreme Court and section 13(2) is reinstated then the former position requiring pecuniary loss as well as distress will be reinstated. Whilst this will be a blow for individuals and the protection of privacy it will be welcomed by most data controllers as it will reduce the number of potential claims for breach of the DPA.

Posted on 09/09/2015 by Ortolan

Get in Touch

If you would like to know more about Ortolan Legal and how we can help you reduce your ongoing recruitment costs, get in touch!

Email us now

   Or call 020 3743 0600

I have worked with Ortolan Legal since 2010 and used their services extensively. They have provided corporate and commercial legal advice and we have also drawn on their capability in the areas of employment law, dispute resolution and property law. What makes them so different is their ability consistently to deliver commercially focussed and high quality advice at a price point which simply cannot be matched by other law firms. They aim to strip out unnecessary overhead costs, concentrate on the quality of their core service and pass on these cost savings to their clients. It works.

Charlie Blackburn, Entrepreneur and co-founder of Brighttalk
See All
Receive news & updates from Ortolan Legal

Meet the Team

  • Nick Benson Nick Benson I qualified as a commercial and corporate solicitor…
  • Liz Delgado Liz Delgado I qualified as a solicitor in 1995 after studying…
  • Carrie Beaumont Carrie Beaumont I qualified as an Employment specialist in 2008. I…